vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $295.5M, roughly 1.1× Duolingo, Inc.). Duolingo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs 4.3%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Duolingo, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.0% vs 12.0%). Duolingo, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($103.0M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Duolingo, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.7% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Duolingo, Inc. is a leading global edtech firm operating a gamified language learning platform. It offers free and premium self-paced courses for over 40 languages, plus language certification, math learning tools, and literacy programs, serving individual learners, schools and corporate clients worldwide.
AIN vs DUOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $295.5M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $35.1M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 55.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 8.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 27.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $295.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $282.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $271.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $252.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $230.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $209.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $192.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $178.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $292.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 72.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 72.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 72.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 71.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 72.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 73.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 107.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $5.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $976.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $884.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $854.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $888.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $977.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $893.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $824.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $822.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $766.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $105.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $103.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 34.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 3.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $368.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $105.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $84.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $105.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $83.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $62.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $89.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $104.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $81.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 2.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 5.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
DUOL
| Bookings | $283.5M | 96% |
| Other | $12.0M | 4% |
