vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $188.4M, roughly 1.7× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -79.7%, a 84.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (95.9% vs 12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (49.0% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
AIN vs FIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $188.4M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $-150.2M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -79.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 95.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -387.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $-1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $140.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $122.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $96.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $84.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-150.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $-97.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $-104.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $120.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-124.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $-48.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | -45.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | -70.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 81.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | -152.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -51.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | -56.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -79.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | -74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 125.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -154.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -51.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -56.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $-1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $-1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $37.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $-122.5K |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $33.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-122.5K | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $181.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $476.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $202.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $370.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $394.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 176.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 20.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 8.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 5.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 7.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 4.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 3.94× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $-69.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-69.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-85.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $-17.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $-68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-151.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-32.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -64.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -71.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -157.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -42.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -37.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 67.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 68.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | -0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
FIP
Segment breakdown not available.
