vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. (HCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($384.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.2× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 4.3%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.1% vs 12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -12.7%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (ticker HCC) is a U.S.-headquartered mining enterprise that produces and distributes high-grade metallurgical coal, a key raw material for steel production. It serves steel manufacturers and industrial clients across core markets including North America, Europe, and Asia.
AIN vs HCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $384.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $23.0M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 9.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 1919.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $328.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $297.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $299.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $297.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $327.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $396.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $503.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $41.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $137.0M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 43.3% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $2.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $300.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $154.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.07× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $336.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $383.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $454.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $491.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $583.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $709.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $693.9M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $154.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $154.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $153.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $153.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $153.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $153.2M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $76.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 3.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $104.1M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 3.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 6.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 47.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
HCC
| Mining Segment | $373.6M | 97% |
| Other | $10.4M | 3% |
