vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Mistras Group, Inc. (MG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $181.5M, roughly 1.8× Mistras Group, Inc.). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 2.1%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 5.1%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $26.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -0.8%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Mistras Group, Inc. is a global provider of asset integrity and protection solutions, offering non-destructive testing, inspection, real-time monitoring, and engineering consulting services. Its key client segments include oil and gas, aerospace, power generation, and manufacturing industries, with operations spanning North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, helping clients enhance operational safety, extend asset lifespans, and minimize unplanned downtime.
AIN vs MG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $181.5M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 5.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -27.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $181.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $195.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $185.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $172.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $182.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $189.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $184.4M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $995.0K |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 25.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $28.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $178.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $235.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $578.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.76× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $178.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $202.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $189.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $171.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $169.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $189.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $198.4M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $235.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $227.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $215.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $198.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $198.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $205.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $193.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $187.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $578.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $596.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $571.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $526.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $523.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $551.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $548.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $542.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 1.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $32.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $26.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 14.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 8.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $8.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $32.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $25.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $604.0K |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-284.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $-4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 8.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | -3.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 4.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
MG
Segment breakdown not available.
