vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Metallus Inc. (MTUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $267.3M, roughly 1.2× Metallus Inc.). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -5.3%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 11.1%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $-37.2M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
AIN vs MTUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $267.3M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $-14.3M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 2.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -7.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 33.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $-0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $305.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $304.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $240.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $227.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $294.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $321.6M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 15.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $686.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $190.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $180.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $240.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $254.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $272.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $278.1M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $13.2M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $686.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $697.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $690.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $686.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $690.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $712.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $736.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $739.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $-1.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | -13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 13.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $-93.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-66.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 9.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | -29.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.80× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
MTUS
| Industrial Market Sector | $95.3M | 36% |
| Manufactured Components | $67.8M | 25% |
| Aerospace And Defense | $39.6M | 15% |
| Seamless Mechanical Tubing | $31.3M | 12% |
| Energy Market Sector | $18.3M | 7% |
| Other | $11.3M | 4% |
| Other Market Sector | $3.7M | 1% |