vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
New Fortress Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($326.2M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.0× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -259.7%, a 264.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs -7.0%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $-134.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -26.8%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
New Fortress Energy Inc. is a global energy infrastructure firm developing, owning and operating LNG import/export terminals, natural gas supply networks and low-carbon projects. It serves utility, industrial and public sector clients across the Americas and Caribbean, delivering affordable, lower-emission energy resources.
AIN vs NFE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $326.2M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $-847.1M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -193.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -259.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | -7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -277.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $-3.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $326.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $228.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $446.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $291.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $609.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $-847.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $-263.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-546.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-175.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-224.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 62.4% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | -193.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | -37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -170.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 30.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -259.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | -109.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -239.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -45.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $-3.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-1.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $226.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $8.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $182.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 44.78× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $226.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $145.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $551.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $447.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $492.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $143.5M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $182.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $10.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 44.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 4.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $-76.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $-134.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | -41.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 18.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $-1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $-76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $-171.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $-329.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $445.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $113.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $-134.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-231.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-726.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-262.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $-210.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-367.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-493.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $-457.9M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -41.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -96.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -318.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -68.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -169.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | -75.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 174.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 66.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 187.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 208.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 85.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | -2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
NFE
Segment breakdown not available.
