vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $187.0M, roughly 1.7× National Storage Affiliates Trust). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs 4.3%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs -1.6%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
AIN vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
NSA
Segment breakdown not available.
