vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $142.2M, roughly 2.3× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs 4.3%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
AIN vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
