vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (PANL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $183.9M, roughly 1.7× Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.). Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 4.3%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (32.5% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is a global dry bulk logistics and shipping service provider. It operates a modern fleet of dry bulk vessels to transport a wide range of commodities including grains, minerals, construction materials, and energy-related raw materials, serving industrial, agricultural, and energy sector clients across North America, Europe, and Asia with tailored end-to-end bulk cargo supply chain solutions.
AIN vs PANL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $183.9M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $11.9M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 9.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 40.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $183.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $156.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $122.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $147.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $153.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $131.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $104.7M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $103.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $249.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $429.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $928.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $94.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $59.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $63.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $93.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $77.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $95.9M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $249.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $256.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $244.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $251.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $90.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $95.9M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $429.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $420.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $414.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $427.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $332.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $331.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $332.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $928.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $916.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $918.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $936.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $749.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $692.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $703.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $15.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $9.0M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 5.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
PANL
| Voyage | $166.3M | 90% |
| Charter | $13.1M | 7% |
| Terminal Stevedore Revenue | $4.4M | 2% |
