vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Paylocity Holding Corp (PCTY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Paylocity Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($387.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.2× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). Paylocity Holding Corp runs the higher net margin — 13.0% vs 4.3%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 11.3%). Paylocity Holding Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($113.6M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Paylocity Holding Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Paylocity Holding Corporation is an American provider of cloud-based payroll, , spend management, and human capital management (HCM) software.
AIN vs PCTY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $387.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $50.2M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 72.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 13.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 34.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $387.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $378.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $369.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $421.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $347.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $333.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $324.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $366.8M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $48.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $91.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $48.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $85.3M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 72.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 73.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 73.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 72.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 74.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 74.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 77.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 29.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 23.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.92 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $1.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.85 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $1.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $162.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $81.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.07× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $162.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $165.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $398.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $477.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $482.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $778.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $401.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $492.7M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $81.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $243.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $325.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $325.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $117.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $113.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 29.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $461.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $117.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $186.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $167.5M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $183.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $89.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $73.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $162.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 43.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 44.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
PCTY
| Recurring Fees | $370.1M | 96% |
| Implementation Services And Other | $16.9M | 4% |
