vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $200.5M, roughly 1.6× ROGERS CORP). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 2.2%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 5.2%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
AIN vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
