vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. (STWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($492.9M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.5× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs 4.3%, a 15.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 8.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc. was one of the largest companies that owned, operated, franchised and managed hotels, resorts, spas, residences, and vacation ownership properties. Starwood was founded in 1969 as a real estate investment trust named Hotel Investors Trust. In 1995, it was acquired and reorganized by Barry Sternlicht, who was its chairman until 2005 and founder of the Starwood Capital Group. Starwood had 11 brands and owned, managed, or franchised 1,297 properties co...
AIN vs STWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $492.9M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $96.9M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 26.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 87.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $488.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $444.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $418.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $454.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $489.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $523.1M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $96.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $129.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $112.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $77.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $154.3M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 30.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $499.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $6.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $63.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $499.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $301.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $259.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $440.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $377.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $357.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $259.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $327.4M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $6.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $63.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $62.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $62.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $62.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $62.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $64.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $64.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $66.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $488.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 5.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $488.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $337.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $-87.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $238.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $295.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $241.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $53.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $55.9M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 5.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | -0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 2.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 5.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 3.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
STWD
| Commercial And Residential Lending Segment | $335.2M | 68% |
| Infrastructure Lending Segment | $70.3M | 14% |
| Property Segment | $57.8M | 12% |
| Other | $29.7M | 6% |
