vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.3× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 4.3%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 2.4%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $11.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
AIN vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
