vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and TRIMAS CORP (TRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.3× TRIMAS CORP). TRIMAS CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 4.3%, a 27.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 3.8%). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $36.8M). Over the past eight quarters, TRIMAS CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Trimas Corp is a diversified industrial manufacturing enterprise that designs, produces and distributes a wide portfolio of engineered products, including specialized fasteners, aerospace components, custom packaging solutions, and consumer & industrial hardware. It primarily serves aerospace, automotive, construction, consumer goods and industrial sectors, with core operations across North America and selected global markets.
AIN vs TRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $81.7M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 5.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 236.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $2.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $256.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $269.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $274.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $-66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $229.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $240.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $81.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $30.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $705.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $407.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $434.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $398.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $409.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $427.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $705.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $725.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $715.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $686.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $667.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $682.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $675.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $117.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $36.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 18.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $109.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | -26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 8.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
TRS
Segment breakdown not available.
