vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arteris, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.1M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.1× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -42.2%, a 69.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arteris, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Arteris, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.7% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Arteris, Inc. is a multinational technology company headquartered in Campbell, California. It develops the network-on-chip (NoC) IP and system-on-chip (SoC) integration automation software that is used to create semiconductor chip and chiplet designs for a variety of devices, particularly in automotive electronics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise computing, communications, consumer, industrial, and aerospace & defense markets. The company specializes in the development a...
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
AIP vs LARK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.1M | $18.8M |
| Net Profit | $-8.5M | $5.1M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -42.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -42.2% | 27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -42.0% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.1% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.0% | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.8% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | 24.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -42.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -51.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.3% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.2% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.19 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-14.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $115.0M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.6M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $148.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $139.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $128.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $115.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.4M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $439.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.0K | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $354.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0K | $3.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | 112.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | 75.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 49.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 25.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIP
| License And Maintenance | $17.5M | 87% |
| Variable Royalties And Other | $2.6M | 13% |
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
