vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of reAlpha Tech Corp. (AIRE) and Digital Realty (DLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $895.3K, roughly 1825.7× reAlpha Tech Corp.). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs -541.6%, a 547.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, reAlpha Tech Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (70.1% vs 16.1%). Over the past eight quarters, reAlpha Tech Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (562.1% CAGR vs 9.8%).
reAlpha Tech Corp is a proptech firm that leverages artificial intelligence to identify, acquire, and operate high-yield short-term residential rental properties primarily across the United States. It provides tech-powered property management solutions to enhance guest experiences and maximize returns for individual and institutional real estate investors.
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
AIRE vs DLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $895.3K | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-4.8M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | 62.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -507.8% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | -541.6% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 70.1% | 16.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | -10.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $895.3K | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $925.6K | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4K | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.2K | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.4K | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.0M | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $80.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -507.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -342.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -326.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -261.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -524.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -479.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1939.6% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -541.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -400.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -328.3% | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -307.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3994.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -618.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2370.9% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $2.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.8M | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $22.9B |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $49.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $587.3K | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.9K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-972.3K | $21.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $21.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7M | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $48.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | $48.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.5M | $45.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | $45.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $45.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $43.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -270.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $719.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $641.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $399.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.2M | $769.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $566.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | $573.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -270.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -294.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -187.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -246.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -372.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.