vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Airsculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS) and Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mama's Creations, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.3M vs $33.4M, roughly 1.4× Airsculpt Technologies, Inc.). Airsculpt Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.8% vs 1.1%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mama's Creations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (50.0% vs -14.6%). Mama's Creations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.7M vs $-2.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Mama's Creations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs -16.2%).
Airsculpt Technologies, Inc. is a medical technology and aesthetic services provider specializing in its proprietary minimally invasive AirSculpt body contouring treatments. The company operates premium clinics across the United States, catering to consumers seeking precise fat removal and body shaping solutions with significantly shorter recovery times than traditional cosmetic procedures.
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
AIRS vs MAMA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $33.4M | $47.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.3M | $540.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.8% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.6% | 50.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 126.7% | 31.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $33.4M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.0M | $35.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.2M | $31.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.5M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.6M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $540.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-591.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.8M | $410.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $553.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.1% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.7% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.4M | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $87.7M | $49.6M |
| Total Assets | $187.3M | $84.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.64× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $56.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $87.7M | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.2M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.3M | $24.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.5M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.0M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $187.3M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.9M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.4M | $52.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.8M | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $208.2M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $210.1M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.7M | $45.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.85× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.5M | $3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | $3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.7% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.97× | 7.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.0K | $6.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-225.0K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $868.0K | $-857.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-405.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-930.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-815.0K | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-576.0K | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.97× | 7.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 4.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
