vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Airship AI Holdings, Inc. (AISP) and Research Solutions, Inc. (RSSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Research Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.8M vs $6.5M, roughly 1.8× Airship AI Holdings, Inc.). Airship AI Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 353.6% vs 4.6%, a 348.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Airship AI Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (102.5% vs -1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Airship AI Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.2% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Airship Industries was a British manufacturers of modern non-rigid airships (blimps) active under that name from 1980 to 1990 and controlled for part of that time by Alan Bond. The first company, Aerospace Developments, was founded in 1970, and a successor, Hybrid Air Vehicles, remains active as of 2022. Airship Industries itself was active between 1980 and 1990.
Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No. 1 on both Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top 500 Design Firms and Trenchless Technolo...
AISP vs RSSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.5M | $11.8M |
| Net Profit | $23.0M | $546.9K |
| Gross Margin | 51.2% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | -9.4% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | 353.6% | 4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 102.5% | -1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 145.8% | 127.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.75 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $546.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $749.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $216.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $669.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.0M | $76.3K |
| Q4 25 | 51.2% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.4% | 51.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.1% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.4% | 46.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | -9.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -55.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.3% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 353.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1106.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 430.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1564.8% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 216.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 288.4% | -23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -302.3% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.75 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.75 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.72 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.61 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.40 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.8M | $12.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-7.1M | $17.2M |
| Total Assets | $19.5M | $44.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.8M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.8K | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.5M | $11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-53.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.1M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | $40.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.15× | 2.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-251.4K | $843.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.7M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.15× | 2.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.09× | 13.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.04× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AISP
Segment breakdown not available.
RSSS
| Transactions | $6.6M | 56% |
| Platforms | $5.2M | 44% |
