vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC (AIT) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs 5.0%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.3% vs -2.5%). APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($95.4M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 3.8%).
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) is a public, global company based in the U.S. and focused on the distribution of bearings, power transmission products, engineered fluid power components and systems, specialty flow control products, and other industrial supplies. AIT provides engineering, design and system integration for industrial and fluid power applications, as well as customized mechanical, fabricated rubber, fluid power, and flow control shop services.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
AIT vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $99.8M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.3% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -0.0% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.65 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.8M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.8M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.8M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.5M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $2.65 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.51 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.63 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.80 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.57 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.39 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.36 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.64 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $171.6M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $365.3M | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $171.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $406.0M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $418.7M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $388.4M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.4M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.5M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $460.6M | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | $365.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $319.1M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $95.4M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.20× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $438.9M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $319.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.7M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.3M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.0M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.5M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.1M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.7M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.2M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | $95.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.4M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.2M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.9M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.9M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.2M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.7M | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.20× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.23× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIT
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
