vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Xiao-I Corp (AIXI) and Kestrel Group Ltd (KG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kestrel Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.4M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.5× Xiao-I Corp). Kestrel Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — -29.0% vs -263.9%, a 234.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Xiao-i is a Chinese cognitive artificial intelligence enterprise founded in 2001.
Kestrel is an American bicycle brand which specialized in high-end bikes for triathlons and road racing.
AIXI vs KG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $17.4M |
| Net Profit | $-30.4M | $-5.1M |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -254.9% | -23.3% |
| Net Margin | -263.9% | -29.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $26.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 77.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -254.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -51.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -263.9% | 1258.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -70.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.80 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $12.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $143.8M |
| Total Assets | $82.4M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $4.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $174.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $173.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $143.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $150.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $525.1K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $51.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-9.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
