vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASSURANT, INC. (AIZN) and Travelers Companies (The) (TRV), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Travelers Companies (The) is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.4B vs $3.4B, roughly 3.7× ASSURANT, INC.). On growth, ASSURANT, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 3.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ASSURANT, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Assurant, Inc. doing business as Assurant, is a global provider of risk management products and services with headquarters in Atlanta. Its businesses provide a diverse set of specialty, niche-market insurance products in the property, casualty, extended device protection, and preneed insurance sectors. The company's main operating segments are Global Housing and Global Lifestyle.
The Travelers Companies, Inc., commonly known as Travelers, is an American multinational insurance company. It is the second-largest writer of U.S. commercial property and casualty insurance, and the sixth-largest writer of U.S. personal insurance through independent agents. Travelers is incorporated in Minnesota, with headquarters in New York City, and its largest office in Hartford, Connecticut. It has been a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average since June 8, 2009.
AIZN vs TRV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.4B | $12.4B |
| Net Profit | — | $2.5B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 25.0% |
| Net Margin | — | 20.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | 3.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 19.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.37 | $10.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $11.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $12.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $11.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $11.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $235.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.6M | $395.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.7M | $534.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $236.4M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $4.37 | $10.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.17 | $8.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | $6.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.83 | $1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.86 | $8.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.55 | $5.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.58 | $2.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.47 | $4.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9B | $32.9B |
| Total Assets | $36.3B | $143.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $32.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $29.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $28.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $27.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $27.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $24.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $25.0B |
| Q4 25 | $36.3B | $143.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8B | $143.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5B | $138.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0B | $136.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0B | $133.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3B | $134.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.8B | $129.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.2B | $127.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $671.0M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $611.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 1.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $671.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $505.0M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.5M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $710.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.5M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $611.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $442.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $339.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $655.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.90× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | 1.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.68× | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.26× | 3.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.77× | 3.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIZN
| Global Lifestyle | $2.6B | 78% |
| Global Housing | $749.1M | 22% |
| Service Contracts And Sales | $34.5M | 1% |
TRV
| Business And International Insurance | $6.6B | 53% |
| Personal Insurance | $4.6B | 37% |
| Bond And Specialty Insurance | $1.2B | 9% |
