vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A.K.A. BRANDS HOLDING CORP. (AKA) and Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
A.K.A. BRANDS HOLDING CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($163.9M vs $115.3M, roughly 1.4× Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd). Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -8.8%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
AKA vs DDL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $163.9M | $115.3M |
| Net Profit | $-14.5M | $6.7M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | -8.8% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -55.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.35 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $163.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $149.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.88 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.85 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.3M | $113.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $111.1M | $135.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $97.8M | $4.5M |
| Total Assets | $397.4M | $178.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.14× | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $111.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $103.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $97.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $397.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $411.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $404.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-633.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $317.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
