vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.0M vs $62.2M, roughly 1.7× Ouster, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
AKR vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $27.0M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-23.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | -93.6% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -88.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $184.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $170.6M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $309.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $-21.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -81.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
OUST
Segment breakdown not available.
