vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and REGIS CORP (RGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.0M vs $57.1M, roughly 1.8× REGIS CORP). ACADIA REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 135.1% vs 0.8%, a 134.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, REGIS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.3% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, REGIS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
REGIS CORPRGSEarnings & Financial Report
Regis Corporation is an American operator of hair salons. As of August 2021, it has 5,563 franchised and 276 company-owned salons. Its headquarters are in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
AKR vs RGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $57.1M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $456.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 22.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | -94.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $49.4M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $456.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $250.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-853.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $91.2M |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 192.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 184.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $43.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $2.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $38.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $18.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $113.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $188.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $588.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $10.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $111.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $95.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $99.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $185.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $68.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $56.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $592.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $599.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $511.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $530.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $508.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 1.75× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $891.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $5.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $891.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
RGS
| Franchise Segment | $37.9M | 66% |
| Royalty | $13.6M | 24% |
| Other | $2.8M | 5% |
| Fees | $1.8M | 3% |
| Franchise Fees | $1.0M | 2% |
