vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $308.4M, roughly 1.8× Astera Labs, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 26.0%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Astera Labs, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (93.4% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Astera Labs, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (100.3% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Astera Labs, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor manufacturer and artificial intelligence company. The company specializes in designing high-speed connectivity solutions for data centers and AI infrastructure. The company has been listed on the Nasdaq since March 2024.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

ALAB vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.8× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$308.4M
ALAB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ALAB
ALAB
+90.2% gap
ALAB
93.4%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
1.8% more per $
KIM
27.9%
26.0%
ALAB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ALAB
ALAB
Annualised
ALAB
100.3%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$308.4M
$542.5M
Net Profit
$80.3M
$151.2M
Gross Margin
76.3%
Operating Margin
20.1%
36.4%
Net Margin
26.0%
27.9%
Revenue YoY
93.4%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
152.4%
-9.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$308.4M
Q4 25
$270.6M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$230.6M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$191.9M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$159.4M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$141.1M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$113.1M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$76.8M
$500.2M
Net Profit
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$80.3M
Q4 25
$45.0M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$91.1M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$51.2M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$31.8M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$24.7M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$-7.6M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$-7.5M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
76.3%
Q4 25
75.6%
Q3 25
76.2%
Q2 25
75.8%
Q1 25
74.9%
Q4 24
74.0%
Q3 24
77.7%
Q2 24
77.9%
Operating Margin
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
20.1%
Q4 25
24.7%
36.4%
Q3 25
24.0%
34.9%
Q2 25
20.7%
39.2%
Q1 25
7.1%
33.6%
Q4 24
0.1%
31.7%
Q3 24
-7.9%
33.7%
Q2 24
-31.7%
32.1%
Net Margin
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
26.0%
Q4 25
16.6%
27.9%
Q3 25
39.5%
25.7%
Q2 25
26.7%
31.0%
Q1 25
20.0%
24.8%
Q4 24
17.5%
31.6%
Q3 24
-6.7%
26.8%
Q2 24
-9.8%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.44
Q4 25
$0.25
Q3 25
$0.50
Q2 25
$0.29
Q1 25
$0.18
Q4 24
$1.23
Q3 24
$-0.05
Q2 24
$-0.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$148.3M
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$1.7B
$19.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$148.3M
Q4 25
$167.6M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$140.4M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$162.3M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$86.4M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$79.6M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$126.1M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$421.1M
$126.4M
Total Debt
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$964.8M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$889.6M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$845.3M
$10.6B
Total Assets
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$983.1M
$20.1B
Q2 24
$915.5M
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$74.6M
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.93×
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$74.6M
Q4 25
$95.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$78.2M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$135.4M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$10.5M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$39.7M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$63.5M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$29.8M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$76.6M
Q3 25
$65.9M
Q2 25
$133.3M
Q1 25
$6.0M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$24.3M
Q3 24
$46.8M
Q2 24
$28.5M
FCF Margin
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
28.3%
Q3 25
28.6%
Q2 25
69.5%
Q1 25
3.7%
38.3%
Q4 24
17.2%
Q3 24
41.4%
Q2 24
37.1%
Capex Intensity
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.9%
0.0%
Q3 25
5.3%
0.0%
Q2 25
1.1%
0.0%
Q1 25
2.8%
3.4%
Q4 24
10.9%
Q3 24
14.8%
Q2 24
1.7%
Cash Conversion
ALAB
ALAB
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
0.93×
Q4 25
2.12×
1.71×
Q3 25
0.86×
2.41×
Q2 25
2.64×
1.87×
Q1 25
0.33×
1.69×
Q4 24
1.61×
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons