vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tradeweb Markets Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($617.8M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.1× Kimco Realty). Tradeweb Markets Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.7% vs 29.8%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tradeweb Markets Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.2% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Tradeweb Markets Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.5% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Tradeweb Markets Inc., headquartered in New York City, operates electronic trading platforms primarily used by institutional investors to trade fixed income products, ETFs, and derivatives. It has over 3,000 customers including banks, asset managers, central banks, pension funds, and insurance companies. In 2024, 83% of the company's revenue was from transaction fees and commissions and 17% was from subscription fees. In 2024, 52% of revenue came from products related to rates, 27% of revenue...

KIM vs TW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TW
TW
1.1× larger
TW
$617.8M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TW
TW
+17.2% gap
TW
21.2%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
TW
TW
7.9% more per $
TW
37.7%
29.8%
KIM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TW
TW
Annualised
TW
23.5%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Revenue
$558.0M
$617.8M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$233.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
46.5%
Net Margin
29.8%
37.7%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
21.2%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
38.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.96

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
$558.0M
$617.8M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$521.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$508.6M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$513.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$509.7M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$463.3M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$448.9M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$405.0M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
$166.3M
$233.2M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$325.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$185.6M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$153.8M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$148.4M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$142.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$113.9M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$119.2M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
37.2%
46.5%
Q4 25
36.4%
42.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
41.4%
Q2 25
39.2%
39.0%
Q1 25
33.6%
40.0%
Q4 24
31.7%
40.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
35.5%
Q2 24
32.1%
40.1%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
29.8%
37.7%
Q4 25
27.9%
62.4%
Q3 25
25.7%
36.5%
Q2 25
31.0%
30.0%
Q1 25
24.8%
29.1%
Q4 24
31.6%
30.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
25.4%
Q2 24
23.9%
29.4%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
$0.46
$0.96
Q4 25
$1.52
Q3 25
$0.86
Q2 25
$0.71
Q1 25
$0.69
Q4 24
$0.66
Q3 24
$0.53
Q2 24
$0.55

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
Total Assets
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$2.1B
Q3 25
$159.3M
$1.9B
Q2 25
$226.6M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$131.3M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$688.6M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$789.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$126.4M
$1.7B
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$6.5B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$6.3B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$6.1B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$5.9B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$5.8B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$5.7B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$5.6B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$8.2B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$8.0B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$8.1B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$7.4B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$7.3B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$7.3B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$7.3B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.1B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$355.9M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$342.3M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$409.2M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$60.2M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$282.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$292.1M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$285.7M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
$2.0M
Q4 25
$336.5M
Q3 25
$328.3M
Q2 25
$403.7M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$58.6M
Q4 24
$256.8M
Q3 24
$287.8M
Q2 24
$280.8M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
0.3%
Q4 25
64.6%
Q3 25
64.5%
Q2 25
78.7%
Q1 25
38.3%
11.5%
Q4 24
55.4%
Q3 24
64.1%
Q2 24
69.4%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
3.7%
Q3 25
0.0%
2.8%
Q2 25
0.0%
1.1%
Q1 25
3.4%
0.3%
Q4 24
5.4%
Q3 24
1.0%
Q2 24
1.2%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
TW
TW
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
1.10×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.84×
Q2 25
1.87×
2.66×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.41×
Q4 24
1.44×
1.98×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.56×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.40×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

TW
TW

Transaction fees and commissions$523.8M85%
Subscription fees$60.3M10%
LSEG market data fees$26.7M4%

Related Comparisons