vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC (AMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $748.2M, roughly 1.9× AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC). AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC runs the higher net margin — -1.0% vs -29.0%, a 28.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 1.8%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $67.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -4.5%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
AMN Healthcare Services Inc. is a leading US healthcare sector workforce solutions and staffing provider. It offers temporary and permanent placement for nurses, physicians, allied health and other clinical/non-clinical staff, plus workforce management tools and consulting for hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities.
ALB vs AMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $748.2M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $-7.7M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 1.1% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | -1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 1.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 95.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $634.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $658.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $689.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $734.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $687.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $740.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $820.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-116.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $-187.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $17.3M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 31.4% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.76 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-3.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-4.90 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $767.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $642.1M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 1.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $41.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $55.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $767.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $642.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $644.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $607.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $715.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $706.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $890.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $876.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $854.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $75.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $67.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 9.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $233.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $75.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $92.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $99.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $81.4M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $68.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $82.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $56.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $47.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $63.2M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 7.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 4.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
AMN
| Travel Nurse Staffing | $208.3M | 28% |
| Allied Staffing | $146.9M | 20% |
| Labor Disruption Services | $124.3M | 17% |
| Technology And Workforce Solutions | $88.0M | 12% |
| Language Services | $69.9M | 9% |
| Other | $29.6M | 4% |
| International Nurse Staffing | $29.6M | 4% |
| Interim Leadership Staffing | $24.1M | 3% |
| Vendor Management Systems | $16.3M | 2% |
| Local Staffing | $8.6M | 1% |
| International Nurse Permanent Placement | $2.6M | 0% |
