vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. (ASO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.0× Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc.). Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs -29.0%, a 34.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 3.0%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-13.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Academy Sports + Outdoors is an American sporting-goods store chain with corporate offices in the Katy Distribution Center in unincorporated western Harris County, Texas, United States, near Katy and west of Houston. For 74 years, it was a privately held company owned by the Gochman family, until its May 2011 acquisition by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. In October 2020, it was listed on NASDAQ.
ALB vs ASO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $71.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 7.3% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 8.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $71.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $125.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $133.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $65.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $142.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $168.2M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $1.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $1.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $1.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $1.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $1.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $2.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $289.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $289.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $285.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $296.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $324.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $378.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $347.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $49.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-13.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $191.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $49.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $157.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $140.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $96.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $91.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $234.7M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $106.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $76.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $167.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $178.9M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 3.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
ASO
| Outdoors | $445.1M | 32% |
| Apparel | $349.8M | 25% |
| Footwear | $292.4M | 21% |
| Sports And Recreation | $288.7M | 21% |
| Other | $7.6M | 1% |
