vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $885.8M, roughly 1.6× BWX Technologies, Inc.). BWX Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -29.0%, a 39.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 15.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $56.8M). Over the past eight quarters, BWX Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
ALB vs BWXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $885.8M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $93.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 30.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $885.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $866.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $764.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $682.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $746.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $672.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $681.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $604.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $93.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $75.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $68.5M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 25.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 24.6% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.82 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.76 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $499.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $499.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $55.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $74.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $48.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $45.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $998.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $946.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $127.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $56.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 7.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.37× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $295.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $127.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $143.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $159.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $50.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $276.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $65.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $94.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $126.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $224.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 2.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 0.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
