vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $633.7M, roughly 2.3× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -29.0%, a 29.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 0.4%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
ALB vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
