vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.5× Albemarle Corporation). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs -29.0%, a 34.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $109.0M).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
ALB vs CSTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $112.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 5.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $112.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $120.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $952.0M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 2.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $845.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $780.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $745.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $796.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 2.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $218.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $109.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $159.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $114.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 3.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
