vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amcor (AMCR) and CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amcor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $2.2B, roughly 2.5× CONSTELLIUM SE). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 3.2%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Amcor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($282.0M vs $109.0M).
Amcor plc develops, produces, and sells packaging products in Europe, North America, Latin America, Africa, and the Asia Pacific regions. The company operates through two segments, Flexibles and Rigid Packaging. The Flexibles segment provides flexible and film packaging products in the food and beverage, medical and pharmaceutical, fresh produce, snack food, personal care, and other industries. The Rigid Packaging segment offers rigid containers for a range of beverage and food products, incl...
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
AMCR vs CSTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $177.0M | $112.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.2% | 5.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 68.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $177.0M | $112.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-39.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.14 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.18 | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $120.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6B | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.6B | $952.0M |
| Total Assets | $37.0B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.26× | 2.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $825.0M | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $827.0M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $445.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $845.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7B | $780.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $745.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $796.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $37.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.18× | 2.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.24× | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.79× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $503.0M | $218.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $282.0M | $109.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.1% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.84× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $805.0M | $159.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $503.0M | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-133.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $114.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $428.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-269.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $943.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $282.0M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-371.0M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $894.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-414.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $809.0M | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.84× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.51× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | 1.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.67× | 1.82× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.80× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMCR
| Flexibles Segment | $3.2B | 59% |
| Rigid Packaging Segment | $2.3B | 42% |
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
