vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $580.6M, roughly 1.6× CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 24.2% vs 9.8%, a 14.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs 1.4%). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.7M vs $171.3M). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 0.5%).
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
CRUS vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $580.6M | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $140.3M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.3% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 24.2% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.5% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.0% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.66 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $580.6M | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $561.0M | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.3M | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.5M | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.7M | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $541.9M | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $852.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $371.8M | $910.7M |
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.6M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1M | $70.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $60.9M |
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.4% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.8% | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | 26.3% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.66 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.48 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.11 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.83 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $1.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.78 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $778.1M | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $778.1M | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $593.5M | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.9M | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.6M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4M | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.8M | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $344.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $502.8M | $333.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $802.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $290.8M | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $285.7M | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 49.2% | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.07× | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $614.5M | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $290.8M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.2M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.4M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.6M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.2M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $285.7M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.3M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.9M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.80× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRUS
| Audio Products Segment | $344.5M | 59% |
| High Performance Mixed Signal Products | $236.2M | 41% |
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
