vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Freeport-McMoRan (FCX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Freeport-McMoRan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $1.4B, roughly 3.7× Albemarle Corporation). Freeport-McMoRan runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -29.0%, a 39.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -10.4%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-312.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -7.9%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., often called Freeport, is an American mining company based in the Freeport-McMoRan Center, in Phoenix, Arizona. The company is the world's largest producer of molybdenum, a major copper producer and operates the world's largest gold mine, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia.
ALB vs FCX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $5.3B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $565.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 12.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $565.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $793.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $721.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 32.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $9.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $18.9B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $58.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $9.4B |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $17.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $17.0B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $58.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $56.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $56.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $56.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $54.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $55.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $54.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $54.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $693.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-312.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 19.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-312.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $608.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $934.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-114.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $673.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $840.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $642.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
FCX
| Morenci | $2.5B | 47% |
| Grasberg Segment | $964.0M | 18% |
| Copper In Concentrates | $934.0M | 18% |
| Molybdenum | $541.0M | 10% |
| Gold | $388.0M | 7% |
