vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Global Business Travel Group, Inc. (GBTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $792.0M, roughly 1.8× Global Business Travel Group, Inc.). Global Business Travel Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -29.0%, a 39.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Global Business Travel Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs 15.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Global Business Travel Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
A travel management company (TMC) is a travel agency which manages organizations' corporate or business travel programs. Such companies will often provide an end-user online booking tool, mobile application, program management, and consulting teams, executive travel services, meetings and events support, reporting functionality, duty of care, and more. Non-Profit travel management companies also provide services to manage complex visa requirements, pre-trip medical needs, remote area travel, ...
ALB vs GBTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $792.0M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $83.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 34.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 692.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $792.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $674.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $631.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $591.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $597.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $625.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $610.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $75.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $-128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $-19.0M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $434.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.88× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $434.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $427.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $601.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $552.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $536.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $524.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $515.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $475.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 1.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $104.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 3.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
GBTG
| Travel | $620.0M | 78% |
| Other | $172.0M | 22% |
