vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO (GPK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.5× Albemarle Corporation). GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -29.0%, a 32.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Graphic Packaging International is a Fortune 500 corporation based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It designs and manufactures packaging solutions for commercial products. GPI manufactures paperboard and folding cartons for a wide range of popular consumer goods, particularly beverages and packaged food. The company operates paperboard mills in Kalamazoo, Michigan; Macon, Georgia; Middletown, Ohio; Prosperity, South Carolina; Texarkana, Texas; and West Monroe, Louisiana, that use recycled...
ALB vs GPK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $71.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 14.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -48.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $104.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $138.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $165.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $190.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $165.0M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $261.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $11.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 1.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $261.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $120.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $129.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $136.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $11.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $11.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 1.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 1.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $521.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $521.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $-174.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $489.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $187.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $161.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | -1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 0.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
GPK
Segment breakdown not available.
