vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -29.0%, a 34.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -2.5%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
ALB vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
