vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $121.0M, roughly 11.8× Ramaco Resources, Inc.). Ramaco Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -11.0% vs -29.0%, a 18.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -27.7%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-17.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -22.7%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Ramaco Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based mining company focused on high-grade metallurgical coal production. It operates mining assets across the Appalachian region, supplying products to global steel manufacturing and industrial clients, with core operations centered on sustainable low-cost metallurgical coal extraction and distribution.
ALB vs METC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $121.0M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $-13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | -11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -5468.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $121.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $153.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $134.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $170.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $172.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $-239.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $193.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $116.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $526.9M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $849.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $193.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $43.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $30.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $116.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $526.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $347.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $355.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $362.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $361.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $366.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $372.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $849.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $674.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $674.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $645.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $659.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $674.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $-1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-17.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -14.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $-24.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 10.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 12.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
METC
| Export Coal Revenues | $73.0M | 60% |
| Domestic Coal Revenues | $48.0M | 40% |
