vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× M/I HOMES, INC.). M/I HOMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -29.0%, a 34.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -4.8%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, M/I HOMES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (4.7% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
ALB vs MHO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $64.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -52.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $2.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $976.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $106.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $121.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $133.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $145.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $146.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $138.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 27.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $2.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $3.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $4.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $3.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $4.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $5.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $5.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $4.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $-8.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $127.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $64.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $-67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $115.8M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $102.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $-68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $115.5M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
