vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $805.0M, roughly 1.8× MODINE MANUFACTURING CO). MODINE MANUFACTURING CO runs the higher net margin — -5.9% vs -29.0%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 15.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-17.1M). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
ALB vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
