vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $2.7M, roughly 529.9× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). Albemarle Corporation runs the higher net margin — -29.0% vs -697.1%, a 668.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-42.0M).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
ALB vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $734.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
PCT
Segment breakdown not available.
