vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($201.5M vs $2.7M, roughly 74.8× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.3% vs -697.1%, a 699.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. ROGERS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($42.2M vs $-42.0M).
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
PCT vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7M | $201.5M |
| Net Profit | $-18.8M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2196.1% | 3.5% |
| Net Margin | -697.1% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 71.0% | 1020.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.14 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $214.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $213.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.2M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-64.7M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-90.6M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-85.6M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | -2196.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1602.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2763.5% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2387.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | -697.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1167.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8741.8% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 559.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.14 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.54 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.29 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.52 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $156.7M | $197.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $45.9M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $922.7M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $156.7M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.4M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $284.1M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.7M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.7M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9M | $119.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.0M | $116.9M |
| Q4 25 | $45.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $238.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $922.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $989.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $787.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $798.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $788.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $719.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $734.0M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-28.7M | $46.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-42.0M | $42.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1559.6% | 20.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 495.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 10.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-183.6M | $71.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-28.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-38.5M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-38.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-33.4M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.4M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.2M | $28.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-42.0M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-42.4M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-45.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-53.4M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-42.6M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-53.5M | $18.7M |
| Q4 25 | -1559.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1743.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2747.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3409.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | 495.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 160.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 521.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 949.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCT
Segment breakdown not available.
ROG
| Elastomeric Material Solutions | $80.5M | 40% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.7M | 35% |
| Transferred Over Time | $47.6M | 24% |
