vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.8× Albemarle Corporation). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs -29.0%, a 51.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 14.0%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $233.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
ALB vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
