vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Woodward, Inc. (WWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× Woodward, Inc.). Woodward, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 12.3% vs -29.0%, a 41.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Woodward, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.4% vs 15.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $38.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Woodward, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.4% CAGR vs 2.4%).

Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...

Woodward, Inc. is an American designer, manufacturer, and service provider of control systems and control system components for aircraft, aircraft engines, industrial engines and turbines, power generation and mobile industrial equipment. The company also provides military devices and other equipment for defense.

ALB vs WWD — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ALB
ALB
1.3× larger
ALB
$1.4B
$1.1B
WWD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WWD
WWD
+7.5% gap
WWD
23.4%
15.9%
ALB
Higher net margin
WWD
WWD
41.3% more per $
WWD
12.3%
-29.0%
ALB
More free cash flow
ALB
ALB
$195.1M more FCF
ALB
$233.1M
$38.0M
WWD
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WWD
WWD
Annualised
WWD
13.4%
2.4%
ALB

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Revenue
$1.4B
$1.1B
Net Profit
$-414.2M
$134.0M
Gross Margin
13.9%
29.0%
Operating Margin
-15.2%
15.4%
Net Margin
-29.0%
12.3%
Revenue YoY
15.9%
23.4%
Net Profit YoY
-650.1%
22.9%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.88
$2.19

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$996.5M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$995.3M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$915.4M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$883.6M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$772.7M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$854.5M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$847.7M
Net Profit
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$134.0M
Q4 25
$-414.2M
$133.7M
Q3 25
$-160.7M
$137.6M
Q2 25
$22.9M
$108.4M
Q1 25
$41.3M
$108.9M
Q4 24
$75.3M
$87.1M
Q3 24
$-1.1B
$83.3M
Q2 24
$-188.2M
$102.1M
Gross Margin
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
29.0%
Q4 25
13.9%
29.3%
Q3 25
9.0%
27.9%
Q2 25
14.8%
27.2%
Q1 25
14.5%
27.2%
Q4 24
11.2%
24.5%
Q3 24
-7.7%
24.3%
Q2 24
-0.7%
27.1%
Operating Margin
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
15.4%
Q4 25
-15.2%
17.0%
Q3 25
-16.6%
16.1%
Q2 25
3.6%
13.9%
Q1 25
1.8%
15.0%
Q4 24
0.4%
13.2%
Q3 24
-81.9%
11.9%
Q2 24
-34.4%
14.4%
Net Margin
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
12.3%
Q4 25
-29.0%
13.4%
Q3 25
-12.3%
13.8%
Q2 25
1.7%
11.8%
Q1 25
3.8%
12.3%
Q4 24
6.1%
11.3%
Q3 24
-78.9%
9.7%
Q2 24
-13.2%
12.0%
EPS (diluted)
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$2.19
Q4 25
$-3.88
$2.17
Q3 25
$-1.72
$2.23
Q2 25
$-0.16
$1.76
Q1 25
$0.00
$1.78
Q4 24
$0.29
$1.42
Q3 24
$-9.45
$1.36
Q2 24
$-1.96
$1.63

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$501.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.2B
$1.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$9.5B
$2.5B
Total Assets
$16.4B
$5.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.33×
0.43×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$501.2M
Q4 25
$454.2M
Q3 25
$1.9B
$327.4M
Q2 25
$1.8B
$473.2M
Q1 25
$1.5B
$364.1M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$283.7M
Q3 24
$1.7B
$282.3M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$308.3M
Total Debt
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$579.9M
Q2 25
$3.6B
Q1 25
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.5B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$655.5M
Q2 24
$3.5B
Stockholders' Equity
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$9.5B
$2.6B
Q3 25
$10.0B
$2.6B
Q2 25
$10.2B
$2.5B
Q1 25
$10.0B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$10.0B
$2.2B
Q3 24
$10.2B
$2.2B
Q2 24
$11.2B
$2.2B
Total Assets
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$5.0B
Q4 25
$16.4B
$4.7B
Q3 25
$17.1B
$4.6B
Q2 25
$17.3B
$4.7B
Q1 25
$17.0B
$4.5B
Q4 24
$16.6B
$4.3B
Q3 24
$17.5B
$4.4B
Q2 24
$18.4B
$4.3B
Debt / Equity
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
0.43×
Q4 25
0.33×
Q3 25
0.36×
0.23×
Q2 25
0.35×
Q1 25
0.35×
Q4 24
0.35×
Q3 24
0.35×
0.30×
Q2 24
0.31×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$388.5M
$91.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$233.1M
$38.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
16.3%
3.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
10.9%
4.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.68×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$692.5M
$388.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$91.0M
Q4 25
$388.5M
$114.4M
Q3 25
$355.6M
$233.3M
Q2 25
$-7.2M
$125.6M
Q1 25
$545.4M
$77.8M
Q4 24
$674.0K
$34.5M
Q3 24
$240.5M
$141.8M
Q2 24
$362.9M
$153.2M
Free Cash Flow
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
$38.0M
Q4 25
$233.1M
$70.3M
Q3 25
$223.4M
$180.9M
Q2 25
$-126.8M
$99.1M
Q1 25
$362.8M
$59.4M
Q4 24
$-355.1M
$942.0K
Q3 24
$-62.6M
$117.7M
Q2 24
$-84.7M
$137.3M
FCF Margin
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
3.5%
Q4 25
16.3%
7.1%
Q3 25
17.1%
18.2%
Q2 25
-9.5%
10.8%
Q1 25
33.7%
6.7%
Q4 24
-28.8%
0.1%
Q3 24
-4.6%
13.8%
Q2 24
-5.9%
16.2%
Capex Intensity
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
4.9%
Q4 25
10.9%
4.4%
Q3 25
10.1%
5.3%
Q2 25
9.0%
2.9%
Q1 25
17.0%
2.1%
Q4 24
28.9%
4.3%
Q3 24
22.4%
2.8%
Q2 24
31.3%
1.9%
Cash Conversion
ALB
ALB
WWD
WWD
Q1 26
0.68×
Q4 25
0.86×
Q3 25
1.70×
Q2 25
-0.31×
1.16×
Q1 25
13.19×
0.71×
Q4 24
0.01×
0.40×
Q3 24
1.70×
Q2 24
1.50×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ALB
ALB

Energy Storage$759.1M53%
Specialties$348.9M24%
Ketjen$320.1M22%

WWD
WWD

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons