vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alector, Inc. (ALEC) and Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alector, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2M vs $3.8M, roughly 1.6× Motorsport Games Inc.). On growth, Motorsport Games Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (94.9% vs -88.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Motorsport Games Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs -37.4%).
Alector, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative immunotherapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Its product pipeline targets unmet medical needs including Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, and Parkinson’s disease, and it collaborates with global pharmaceutical partners to advance candidate therapies through clinical trials.
Motorsport Games Inc. is an American video game developer, publisher and esports event organizer based in Miramar, Florida. Motorsport Games is owned by Driven Lifestyle Group LLC.
ALEC vs MSGM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.2M | $3.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $839.3K |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.9% |
| Net Margin | — | 21.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -88.5% | 94.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1696.9% | 131.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.9M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $839.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-34.7M | $789.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.5M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-40.5M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-42.2M | $-554.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.1M | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 85.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 82.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 73.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 78.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1153.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -433.6% | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1216.5% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.4% | -33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -315.7% | -107.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -302.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -275.0% | -40.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1063.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -387.7% | 164.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1101.6% | 59.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.8% | -133.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -275.2% | -30.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -256.4% | 111.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -227.0% | -55.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.34 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.30 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.41 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.43 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.40 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $256.0M | $5.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $30.6M | $6.8M |
| Total Assets | $293.2M | $12.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $256.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $291.1M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $307.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.6M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.4M | $859.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $503.3M | $300.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $562.1M | $500.0K |
| Q4 25 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.7M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.6M | $648.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.8M | $496.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $178.9M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $293.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $335.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $408.3M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $468.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.7M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $635.5M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-184.0M | $1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-184.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2951.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-326.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-184.0M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.0M | $-30.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.8M | $305.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-50.7M | $-680.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.8M | $-695.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-61.3M | $-373.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-184.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-50.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-63.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-61.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2951.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -997.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -623.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1655.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -101.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -332.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -418.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -389.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
