vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALAMO GROUP INC (ALG) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALAMO GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($373.6M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.8× T1 Energy Inc.). ALAMO GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs -62.0%, a 66.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. ALAMO GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($69.9M vs $55.0M).
The Alamo Drafthouse Cinema is an American cinema chain founded in 1997 in Austin, Texas, which is famous for serving dinner and drinks during the film, as well as its strict policy of requiring its audiences to maintain proper cinema-going etiquette. Sony Pictures Experiences acquired the chain in June 2024.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
ALG vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $373.6M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $15.5M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.8% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.28 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $373.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $419.1M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.9M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.3M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.3M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $425.6M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.4M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.8M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.3M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.1M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.10 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.57 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.64 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.33 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.28 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.35 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.67 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $309.7M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $190.7M | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $309.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.8M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.3M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.5M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.4M | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.1M | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $201.8M | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $278.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.5M | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $979.7M | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $956.6M | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.32× | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.1M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $69.9M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.7% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $146.9M | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.5M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.3M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.1M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.4M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.5M | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.84× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.03× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALG
| Wholegood Units | $293.2M | 78% |
| Parts | $61.6M | 16% |
| Other Revenue | $18.9M | 5% |
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |