vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alignment Healthcare, Inc. (ALHC) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× Alignment Healthcare, Inc.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 0.9%, a 14.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -74.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Alignment Healthcare, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.6% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Alignment Healthcare, Inc. is a U.S.-based healthcare provider offering Medicare Advantage plans for seniors. It adopts a value-based care model, partnering with local providers to deliver personalized coordinated medical services, prescription drug coverage and supplemental benefits to members across multiple U.S. states.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ALHC vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $11.4M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -74.7% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $993.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $926.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $701.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $692.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.3M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $11.4M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.1M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.1M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.7% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $705.6M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $206.9M | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $705.6M | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $604.2M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.8M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.5M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $470.6M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $381.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.7M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $323.2M | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $322.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $321.4M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $206.9M | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.9M | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.0M | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.1M | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.9M | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.5M | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.7M | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $895.6M | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $782.1M | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $692.3M | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $716.3M | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.80× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.22× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $128.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 11.27× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $128.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-50.4M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.7M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.5M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-55.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 11.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.77× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
