vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. (ALK) and Grab Holdings Ltd (GRABW), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $1.5B, roughly 2.5× Grab Holdings Ltd). Grab Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs 1.8%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Alaska Air Group, Inc. is an American airline holding company based in SeaTac, Washington, United States. The group owns two mainline carriers, Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines, along with a regional airline, Horizon Air. Alaska Airlines in turn wholly owns an aircraft ground handling company, McGee Air Services.
Grab Holdings Inc. is a Singaporean multinational technology company headquartered in one-north, Singapore. It is the developer of a super-app for ride-hailing, food delivery, and digital payment services on mobile devices. It operates in Singapore, Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam.
ALK vs GRABW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $21.0M | $26.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -2.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -70.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-166.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-132.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.35 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.84 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $627.0M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1B | $6.4B |
| Total Assets | $20.4B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $627.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $185.0M | $591.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 8.81× | 22.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $185.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $274.0M | $591.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $580.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $292.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $235.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.86× | 22.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALK
| Alaska Airlines Segment | $2.3B | 64% |
| Hawaiian Airlines Segment | $822.0M | 23% |
| Regional Segment | $468.0M | 13% |
GRABW
Segment breakdown not available.
