vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allegion (ALLE) and Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Allegion is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $663.0M, roughly 1.6× Churchill Downs Inc). Allegion runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 12.5%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Allegion posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.7% vs 3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Allegion's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -13.7%).
Allegion plc manufactures and sells mechanical and electronic security products and solutions worldwide. The company offers door closers, controls, and exit devices; locks, locksets, portable locks, and key systems and services; electronic security products and access control systems; time, attendance, and workforce productivity systems; doors and door systems; and other accessories. The company sells its products and solutions to end-users in commercial, institutional, and residential facili...
Churchill Downs Incorporated is the parent company of Churchill Downs. The company has evolved from one racetrack in Louisville, Kentucky, to a multi American-state-wide, publicly traded company with racetracks, casinos and an online wagering company among its portfolio of businesses.
ALLE vs CHDN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $663.0M |
| Net Profit | $138.1M | $83.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 21.6% |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | 12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.7% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.8% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $663.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $665.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $683.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $934.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $941.9M | $642.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $945.6M | $624.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $967.1M | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.6M | $890.7M |
| Q1 26 | $138.1M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | $51.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.4M | $38.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.7M | $216.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $76.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.1M | $71.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.2M | $65.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.4M | $209.3M |
| Q1 26 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 35.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 37.0% |
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.18 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.85 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.71 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.99 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $308.9M | $200.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $840.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.97× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $308.9M | $200.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $356.2M | $200.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.7M | $180.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $656.8M | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.5M | $174.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $503.8M | $175.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $878.9M | $152.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $747.5M | $140.3M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $840.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $5.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.69× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $101.3M | $295.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.73× | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $101.3M | $295.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $240.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.5M | $187.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.5M | $246.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.9M | $169.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.8M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.4M | $233.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | $154.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 36.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | 0.73× | 3.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 4.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | 3.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALLE
| Allegion Americas | $809.9M | 78% |
| Allegion International | $223.7M | 22% |
CHDN
| Live and Historical Racing | $297.0M | 45% |
| Gaming | $257.0M | 39% |
| Wagering Services and Solutions | $109.0M | 16% |