vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allegion (ALLE) and CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.5× Allegion). Allegion runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 5.8%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Allegion posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 4.8%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $200.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Allegion's revenue compounded faster (7.5% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Allegion plc manufactures and sells mechanical and electronic security products and solutions worldwide. The company offers door closers, controls, and exit devices; locks, locksets, portable locks, and key systems and services; electronic security products and access control systems; time, attendance, and workforce productivity systems; doors and door systems; and other accessories. The company sells its products and solutions to end-users in commercial, institutional, and residential facili...
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
ALLE vs CLH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $147.5M | $86.6M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.70 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $941.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $945.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $967.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $893.9M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.4M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.7M | $126.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $58.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.1M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.2M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.4M | $133.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.8M | $69.8M |
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.9% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | 9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.70 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.18 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.85 | $2.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.71 | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.99 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.77 | $2.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.41 | $1.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.2M | $127.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $7.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.96× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $356.2M | $127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.7M | $91.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $656.8M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.5M | $105.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $503.8M | $102.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $878.9M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $747.5M | $91.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $391.8M | $104.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $240.1M | $355.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $200.5M | $233.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.4% | 15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 8.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.63× | 4.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $685.7M | $441.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $240.1M | $355.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.5M | $302.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.7M | $208.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.0M | $303.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.9M | $239.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $216.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.1M | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | $200.5M | $233.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.8M | $207.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.4M | $-117.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.9M | $241.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | $142.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.1M | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9M | $-119.4M |
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | 0.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALLE
| Products | $750.2M | 73% |
| Allegion International | $237.7M | 23% |
| Services | $45.2M | 4% |
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |